This article by Frank Wong is an important illustration of the implied legitimacy that can result from publications appearing in open access journals that feature pseudoscientific claims. Open access is not, of itself, problematic and there are some excellent open access journals. The problem is that there are hundreds of others publishing poorly-vetted, and potentially fraudulent work, every day. Wong also calls out media voices in the anti-vaccination movement, such as Jenny McCarthy and Michelle Bachmann, for the damage they have caused by their anti-science activism. There is a body count resulting from their statements, and it is criminal.
- RT @NSAAtheist: But I'm mean and ignorant for saying there's a connection. Even though the murderers themselves say there is one. https://… 2 hours ago
- @NSAAtheist Whoa woah woah, people! This isn't what I told you to do, me dammit! 2 hours ago
- RT @NSAAtheist: Seriously. If you were a deity and people who worshiped you were killing other people for worshiping you differently, would… 2 hours ago
- RT @kashanacauley: *whitney houston voice* "I believe the children are our future." twitter.com/rawstory/statu… 2 hours ago
- RT @cowbirdlab: Cowbird moms choosy when selecting foster parents for their young – Merrill et al yubanet.com/scitech/cowbir… 2 hours ago
- 232,573 hits