This article by Frank Wong is an important illustration of the implied legitimacy that can result from publications appearing in open access journals that feature pseudoscientific claims. Open access is not, of itself, problematic and there are some excellent open access journals. The problem is that there are hundreds of others publishing poorly-vetted, and potentially fraudulent work, every day. Wong also calls out media voices in the anti-vaccination movement, such as Jenny McCarthy and Michelle Bachmann, for the damage they have caused by their anti-science activism. There is a body count resulting from their statements, and it is criminal.
- RT @sabo_sebrazzo: So excited that I was able to attend #sacnas2017 and see so many brown and black people in STEM #winning #TrueDiversity… 11 minutes ago
- RT @CasualFennec: Dinosaurs are so cool https://t.co/LpkzdWKdim 13 minutes ago
- RT @GretchenCarlson: Nobody pays $32m for false allegations - nobody twitter.com/billoreilly/st… 14 minutes ago
- Because they are bloody hypocrites and destroying Clinton was never about "Benghazi"? twitter.com/EdKrassen/stat… 3 hours ago
- RT @realscientists: Explaining how academic publishing works to non-ac friends: "So how much do you get paid for your papers?" "Oh no,… 4 hours ago
- 235,060 hits