Outdoor Radio: Grassland Ambassadors Help Globetrotting Bobolinks Successfully Nest — Vermont Center for Ecostudies


If there is any one bird that got me interested in birding, it’s probably the Bobolink. On the family farm in New York’s Mohawk Valley, we had Bobolinks nesting each summer in our small pasture and in the hayfields across the road. How my 4 siblings managed to grow up in the same place and not notice this song or the weird bird with the yellow bonnet that was black below and white on its back, I’m at a loss to explain.

Bobolinks also taught me about conservation: There were farms all around us but only certain fields had Bobolinks. Crop fields? Nope. Pastures? Not if the grass was short. Most hayfields? Too small. I was keenly aware of habitat selection, loss, and fragmentation – and how they resulted from management – before I had learned long division. All that took was looking for Bobolinks and developing a mental map of what they “liked”.

Bobolinks are still common, not for our lack of trying. Our native grassland birds are embattled and their numbers have plummeted from peaks in the last century. This link addresses what some in Vermont are doing to help them and, by extension, all manner of other native grassland wildlife. Check it out.

A handsome male Bobolink lands in the tall grass to feed and sing for a moment on the McCuiag’s farm. / © K.P. McFarland With a burst of tweets and twitters that sound like R2D2 from “Star Wars” movie fame, the Bobolinks circle overhead. After a long migration from their wintering grounds in South America,…

via Outdoor Radio: Grassland Ambassadors Help Globetrotting Bobolinks Successfully Nest — Vermont Center for Ecostudies

Quote | Posted on by | Leave a comment

Agricultural & Urban Habitat Drive Long-Term Bird Population Changes — Auk & Condor Updates


Birders are constantly confronted with loss of habitats we think best support various species and the surprise of finding species in what we would consider unsuitable habitat. It’s easy to write off the marginal places as population sinks or ecological traps –– and that’s very often the case –– but not always, as this paper illustrates.

Land use changes are a major driver of species declines, but in addition to the habitat to which they’re best adapted, many bird species use “alternative” habitats such as urban and agricultural land. A new study from The Condor: Ornithological Applications documents a century of land use change in Illinois and shows that species’ long-term […]

via Agricultural & Urban Habitat Drive Long-Term Bird Population Changes — Auk & Condor Updates

Quote | Posted on by | Leave a comment

You know these answers


I’ll begin with a brief quiz. You don’t need to study for this; I think you’ll do quite well. Read the prompt and pay attention to the first thing that pops into your head:

  1. powerhouse of the cell
  2. king of pop
  3. quicker picker-upper
  4. two roads diverged in a wood and I,
  5. make America

I suspect most folks – at least in the US – will have immediately thought of . . .

  1. mitochondria
  2. Michael Jackson
  3. Bounty paper towels
  4. I took the one less traveled by
  5. great again
Screen Shot 2018-07-19 at 5.20.48 PM.png

Americans of a certain age will never forget Rosie.

In advertising, branding, music, politics –– even when studying for your biology test –– repetition can make simple associations stick. I’m not exactly sure of the mechanism or theory behind this phenomenon, but I think it has to do with the brain seeking familiar patterns. Familiar thought patterns are attractive because they take less effort than the mental attention required to make sense of an unfamiliar set of ideas. I think of it like needing to get across a field and having the choice between following a well-groomed path or cutting your own way through the greenbrier and raspberry.

Familiar mental patterns can be relaxing and comforting internally, but they can also be powerful unifying forces for big groups, as is on display anytime a sports teams needs a boost from the hometown fans, chanting something in unison.

Comfort. Tribalism. When these emotions are played to advance some agenda of the playER, they can be powerful enough to affect human behavior even when it might conflict with otherwise objective realities. When we sacrifice logic for these repetitively-driven thought patterns, that’s where I would say we’ve crossed into the realm of hypnotic repetition. In a place of familiar comfort and solidarity with people like us we can fall prey to some pretty awful ideas.

If repetition helps us remember something, that’s memorization. It might be too simplistic to get us very far, but it’s generally innocuous. If repetition changes the way we think about something, that’s the hypnotic part. See hypnotic repetition in politics here.

Of course, few have mastered this art quite as well as Donald J. Trump. It’s how he got elected, and he uses it all the time.

 

Screen Shot 2018-07-19 at 4.12.00 PM.png

 

Crooked Hillary. Lock her up! Fake news. No collusion.

Pithy slogans like these are the Trump doctrine. It makes sense, too: his entire real estate career and most of his other ventures have to do with branding. Labeling something Trump, in his mind at least, means it’s the best of the best. It’s the most most glamorous. The glitziest! He’s made a fortune not in constructing the most spectacular buildings, but in acquiring properties and existing structures to brand with his name. The more he says that Trump products are the best, the more people come to believe it because it’s familiar and familiar is good. The better his “ratings” are the happier he is, because he understands that every time a human being encounters his name, he’s likely to make more money.

Hypnotic repetition gets dangerous when it’s combined with great power. Then you’re potentially manipulating the thought processes of millions of people. (“Under His eye.” “May the Lord open.”) In Trump’s case, his latest attack on the free press as Amy Siskind illustrates above is reckless. It may even have already cost lives at the Capital Gazette, but it’s also counter to the guarantee of a free press established in the First Amendment of the US Constitution:

Amendment I. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

In other words, Trump’s deft application of hypnotic repetition is being used before our eyes to –– on its face –– sow discord among Americans concerning the Mueller Probe. That’s bad enough, but if successful in casting doubt on the validity of our free press or indeed its right to report on Mueller’s investigation, Trump’s use of hypnotic repetition will have damaged a core principle of what it means to be American.

Screen Shot 2018-07-19 at 5.59.37 PM.png

 

Posted in editorial, life, skepticism and science | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A conversation about grad school


I can’t tell you how many times I’ve had this conversation. I plan to keep having it, too. But if this example can help answer some questions pre-emptively, I reckon this will have been a good use of my time.

Scene: An undergrad comes to my office to discuss careers . . . I speak in blue; they in black.

So you’re interested in a career in wildlife/ecology/conservation/natural resource management, etc?
Screen Shot 2018-07-17 at 11.35.00 AM

Yes! I want to pet Bambi too!

Are you considering grad school? 
Screen Shot 2018-07-17 at 11.28.52 AM

I don’t know. Maybe. I guess I don’t know that much about it.

That’s okay. Graduate school in our field usually means 2–3 years toward a master’s degree and 4–5 toward a PhD.

Years more school?! I’ve got a 10-page paper due at midnight and a CHEM midterm tomorrow. Why on Earth would I want to do more school?

Well, a PhD is primarily for people who want to pursue careers in research and/or college teaching, but a master’s degree can be useful for all sorts of careers in our field. For example, if you want to be doing the on-the-ground management at some state agency’s  wildlife management reserve, then you’re okay to compete for jobs like that with a bachelor’s degree. If, however, you want to be in charge of all the people working at all the agency’s reserves, then you’ll definitely need a master’s degree. There are loads of exceptions of course, but in general a bachelor’s degree in our field will help you get a job; a master’s degree will help you build a career.

 

(not too shabby a place to work, but you might be aiming even higher)

I don’t know how I’d survive two more years of coursework! What kind of classes would I take?

The focus in a master’s program is on you and your thesis; coursework comes second. You’ll probably take about 2 courses per semester in grad school.

That’s it?

Yep! There will be some advanced ecology courses to take, but your coursework will probably emphasize things like statistics, data management, and GIS.

That doesn’t sound like fun.

Screen Shot 2018-07-17 at 11.58.09 AM

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have many applications for wildlife ecology. Here, a species’ probability of use of land cover is mapped across a management unit.

You’ll find such courses to be a lot more fun when you see how important they are to help you finish your thesis.

Yeah, so what is a thesis anyway?

It’s a paper that describes a research project that you managed while you were a student.

A paper? How long is it?

Varies, but generally something like 50–100 pages in a couple of chapters.
Screen Shot 2018-07-17 at 12.05.52 PM
Relax, it’s mostly tables and stuff. Double-spaced. And you have, like, 3 years to write it.

Oh, I guess that’s not too bad. What will it be about?

Well, you’ll work with a faculty advisor or mentor who will be a partner with you on some project. You might work in that person’s lab on some facet of research they’ve already got going or you might develop some project totally on your own. Very often master’s students are hired to manage some project associated with a grant that the mentor has received. If so, a lot of the basic structure of the project is already determined and you work with your advisor to fine-tune the questions and the study design to your purpose.

So it’s okay if I don’t have a project of my own that I’d want to do?

Usually, yes. There’s some project that needs to be done to fulfill what was promised in the grant, but there’s also some flexibility for you to develop your own part of it.

Okay. So how is the thesis graded?

You’ll have a committee that includes 2 or 3 other faculty working with you and your advisor to help you develop your questions, design the methods, etc. Ultimately they will assess your progress in a final defense that is pass/fail.

That sounds terrifying.

Too often it is, but if you’re working with your committee through the entire process you’ll be fine. A good advisor will not let you schedule your defense until it’s clear that you will pass.

Okay. Is that it?

Almost. The thing that really defines successful research in graduate school is the publication of one or more journal articles from your thesis.

I’d be . . . an author?

Screen Shot 2018-07-17 at 12.12.15 PM
Ideally, yes. It’s difficult as the external reviewers are often a lot tougher than the student’s own committee but publication is really the goal. Even if you don’t care about publishing for your own career, your faculty advisor will. Research faculty are under tremendous pressure to publish as many papers as possible. Your advisor selected you for this opportunity because you provided the best likelihood of completing the project and publishing papers from it. If you don’t publish that might not hurt your career, but it probably will hurt your advisor’s career.

Oh. That’s a lot of responsibility then.

Yes it is, but you’re up to the task.

All right, well this sounds like something that would be good to do, but I don’t think I could afford it. I’m almost maxed out on my student loans already.

It’s free.
Screen Shot 2018-07-17 at 12.19.06 PM.png
It’s free. Grad school in wildlife/ecology/conservation/natural resources is free. Your tuition is waived and they pay you to work on an assistantship. You might be a teaching assistant in something like Intro Bio labs or you might be a research assistant who is paid to manage whatever project is supported by the outside grant your advisor was awarded.

Wait – they pay you to go to grad school?!

Well, not a lot, but yes. A master’s student on an assistantship in my department will have their tuition waived and be paid a monthly stipend of about $1300, plus health benefits. The University will still charge you those annoying “fees” that will amount to several hundred dollars per semester. Our grad students don’t get rich, but they seem to have enough for rent, food, car payments, beer, and the vet bills for the dogs they seem to collect along the way.

That’s a lot more money than I’m making now! So if I decide to do it, can I work in . . . your lab?  How do I decide where to go?

Well, it depends. There’s a lot of variability in how different universities and even departments within a university do this. The important thing to recognize is that the $15,000 or so paid to the graduate student is part of about $30,000 needed to create the position for the student. Money for the tuition waivers, benefits, etc. has to come from somewhere. For me to recruit a student for two years on a master’s-level project, I’m going to need an external grant of at least $60,000. To cover the student for a more realistic 2 and a half years and pay for whatever field work might be involved for the project, $100,000 is more typical as a rock-bottom grant for a fully-funded master’s student. In other words, if I don’t have a dedicated $100k then I’m not able to recruit a student. It doesn’t matter how badly I might want to work with a student or how great a fit that student is for the research we do in my lab, without the outside grant that creates a position, I cannot recruit the student.

Oh.

Yeah, but it’s not like that for everyone. Another department here has folks who do work similar to mine, but they also teach giant service courses like Intro Bio. That means they need lots of teaching assistants to cover all those labs and there are always open positions for teaching assistantships that faculty can use to recruit new students.

Oh!

Screen Shot 2018-07-17 at 12.26.51 PM.png

Yep. That’s how I got my master’s degree: I worked as a TA in the Intro Bio and Zoology labs to pay for my tuition waiver and stipend, I took my own courses (2 per semester), and I collected the data for my thesis in the summers. In that case, my faculty advisor had some small grants to cover expenses in the field and that was enough to get the project done. Many grad students on TAs these days will apply for their own grants to cover expenses in the field or, if it’s a big grant program, bring in enough of their own money that they don’t even need the teaching assistantship.

That sounds cool.

It is.

So how do I find someone to work with?

There are two main ways. The first is to find some faculty member somewhere whose work is of interest to you. You might discover them through reading one of their papers in a class or via social media, etc. With 3 or 4 people identified who you might want to work with, use some Google magic to learn as much about their lab as you can. You’ll want to see an updated website, evidence of productivity with lots of published papers (including links), a diverse and happy group of previous grad students with their current contact information provided, etc. For those who make the cut for you, simply fire off a quick email:
“Dear Dr. So-and-so: I am a ______ major who will graduate in _______, and I am seeking potential opportunities for graduate research toward a master’s degree. I discovered your lab through a reading of ___________ in one of my classes, and I have grown increasingly interested in __________ since then. Do you anticipate recruiting a new graduate student in August or January of ________? If so, could you please direct me to an advertisement for the position or advise on your availability to discuss potential opportunities? I have attached a resume to provide you with some sense of my experience and qualifications. I look forward to your reply.”

That sounds so grown up.

I know, but you can do it.
The other way to find a grad school opportunity is to simply respond to posted advertisements. When I have a new grant and am actively recruiting a student, I’ll develop a detailed position description and post it to my own website, on Facebook, Twitter, etc. I’ll also advertise on dedicated search engines. In my case, I use the Ornithology Exchange and Texas A&M Wildlife Job Board. EcoJobs is another popular one for our outdoorsy-type jobs.
Screen Shot 2018-07-17 at 12.32.54 PM.png

So I can just go to sites like those and, like, look for jobs?

Yep, and that offers several advantages for you. First, you know you’re finding people who actually are looking for students and are advertising projects that already have their funding secured. You’ll also discover projects that will broaden your perspective to the type of work people are getting funded to do, and you’ll learn about people, labs, and universities you might not otherwise have considered. Finally, you’ll see descriptions of the type of qualifications people are looking for these days.

Oh, that reminds me. This CHEM test tomorrow?  Ya, I’m not gonna graduate with a 4.0!

That’s okay. Unlike something like Med or Vet school, we’re a lot more forgiving about arbitrary numbers like GPA or standardized test scores. For us a 3.0 might be enough if it’s combined with lots of relevant experience in the field, using GIS, etc. Working as an undergraduate field technician for graduate students is the best way to build those skills and make yourself competitive for grad student positions.

So if I have lots of experience I might be competitive even though my GPA isn’t so hot?

Experience is the only thing that saved me as an undergrad, ’cause my GPA was an embarrassment!

Okay well this has been helpful but I really need to go work on that paper now – thanks!

All right – good luck and best wishes for that CHEM test, too!
NREM 1st Gen Students.jpg

Helping undergrads figure out their futures? That just might be the best part of my job.

Posted in academics, editorial, life, professional development | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Under attack from within


I really would rather not be posting about political issues here, but these are indeed extraordinary days we’re living.

To begin, consider this definition and this oath:

Screen Shot 2018-07-16 at 4.34.49 PM

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

 

The 35 words in Article II, Section I, of the Constitution read as follows:

“I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Screen Shot 2018-07-16 at 4.36.03 PM

this guy gets it

A U.S. President vows to faithfully, i.e., truthfully, defend the Constitution. The Constitution defines treason as giving aid to enemies of the United States. Such aid would include helping those enemies escape punishment for their attacks on our sovereignty.

 

 

So, here’s a thought experiment for today, 16 July 2018:

Imagine it is 1941, and we don’t know who bombed Pearl Harbor. We suspect it was Japan but we don’t know for sure, and an investigation begins.

For the next 14 months during which we pursue no one for this attack, our intelligence agencies provide mounting evidence that it was indeed Japan behind the attack. The entire time, President Roosevelt tries to deflect attention away from Japan and he in fact wages a propaganda campaign against our own agencies in an attempt to derail and discredit the investigation.

Finally, in 1943, there is a press release from the investigation confirming, unequivocally, that it was indeed Japan who attacked us at Pearl Harbor. Two days after that announcement, Roosevelt is in Singapore meeting with Emperor Hirohito. During a press conference related to this summit, Roosevelt publicly denounces the work of the US investigators and expresses his support for Hirohito’s explanation that Japan played no part in the attack on Pearl Harbor.

Screen Shot 2018-07-16 at 4.37.57 PM

“Hirohito’s fine. He’s fine. We’re all fine.”

The clarity of the events and, of course, the death toll are vastly different between the respective attacks on U.S. sovereignty in 1941 by Japan and in 2016 by Russia. But if you would have considered my fictional FDR above to have committed treason then, applying the same criteria, DJT just committed treason against the United States today.

Posted in editorial, life | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Essential Pride month reading and viewing for straight friends & colleagues


via Essential Pride month reading and viewing for straight friends & colleagues

This day marks a celebration for LGBTQIA people in science, and it’s important to me to express my support for diversity in STEM. Few things I’ve seen better illustrate the hundreds of little barriers gay people confront every day than this compilation prepared by ornithologist Alex Bond. He called it essential, and I agree. Read. Learn. Grow.

Quote | Posted on by | Leave a comment

No more recommendation letters, please


Has this happened to you?

You find a job announcement for a position that could be a great fit for you, but it’s due tomorrow! To apply, send CV (okay), a cover letter (yeah!), and three letters of recommendation from people who coul — (ugh, forget it! There’s no way I’m going to bug my references to drop everything and send letters on my behalf.) Result: You never even apply for what might have been a fantastic job.

I can’t tell you how many jobs I never applied for just to save my referees the annoyance of having to send letters on my behalf.

Screen Shot 2018-07-02 at 1.08.09 PM.png

A Letter of Recommendation, Atonio Rotta (1872)

How about the flipside? Of course I am asked to write a lot of these letters, too – I’d say it averages about 30 each year (I did 55 recently). Now if most of those are the same person applying for many things then that’s not too bad and I can crank those letters out pretty quickly. But I teach some big classes, often with 100 or more students. This means that I get a lot of requests from different people, each one needing a 1–2 hour investment in me crafting that original letter. I know that it takes a lot of time for referees to write these letters because it takes a lot of time from me. But students need them because employers keep asking for them so I keep writing them.

I’m hardly the first to complain about this. One big beef a lot of folks have with written recommendations is that they so rarely make a difference in a hiring decision. We teach students to seek referees who will provide them with a good reference (if for no other reason than to avoid a potential lawsuit from providing a poor one), and that’s what we do – try to present the person in the best possible light for the position. So if every applicant has three good letters on file, then they’re not being evaluated on the strength of their own merits but on the communication skills of their referees.

It doesn’t have to be this way. How about this instead?

You find a job announcement for a position that could be a great fit for you, but it’s due tomorrow! To apply, send CV (okay), a cover letter (yeah!), and the names and contact information for three individuals who could provide a character reference for you (Yes!  I can do that!!).

Think of the boon to productivity that could result. First, instead of three separate letters needing to be written and administered and evaluated for each of, say, 40 applicants for a position (that’s 120 letters now), it’s only the 6 or so who make the short list whose references are contacted at all. Those telephone or email contacts can be brief and direct: All we really need to know is if the skills the person claims are actually skills that person has. Once it is determined that the applicant is neither a fraud nor an office-poisoning monster, the hiring decision can be based on the merits of the application and interview performance. Above all, we need to resist the temptation to ask several specific questions and follow that with a request for the referee to add anything else or attach a letter. That’s just adding insult to injury!

With a little forethought, we can make the search and screening process a lot less painful for everyone. Let’s get on this!

Posted in academics, editorial, life | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment