Where we wouldn’t put wind turbines


Speaking of turbines (and again, nine years ago), where *wouldn’t* we put them?

The Waterthrush Blog

Let’s just say for the sake of argument that wind power actually was as “green” as developers and lobbyists would have us believe – a big stretch, but bear with me. It would make good energy sense to erect towers and transmission lines anywhere we had favorable winds, right? But I suspect there would be some examples of places that – again for the sake of argument – were windy enough for development to make sense, but were otherwise so important to us that we wouldn’t actually want the spot developed for wind power. Here are a few examples:

Ellis Island?

Fenway Park?

The Rose Bowl?

Arlington National Cemetery?

Gettysburg National Park?

Colonial Williamsburg?

Disneyland?

Old Faithful?

Mount Rushmore?

Yosemite National Park?

The Hollywood sign?

Surely it’s only the truly deluded (or simply the biggest jerks) who would ever consider drastically altering the character and quality of these special places…

View original post 127 more words

Advertisements
Posted in life | Leave a comment

The dark side of wind power


I was already fed up with wind farms in 2009.

The Waterthrush Blog

We can talk about numbers – more birds are killed by windows than anything else – so the number of birds killed by wind turbines is generally thought to be an acceptable amount of “collateral damage.” But what about seeing it as it happens? Is watching a majestic, soaring bird violently ripped from the air by the sweep of a wind turbine’s rotor blade enough to steer our national conversation on wind power toward greater attention in sustainability and the identification of absolute “no build” areas? See for yourself here.
dead_under_a_turbine7[1](1)
Much credit is due billionaire T. Boone Pickens for his effort to promote wind power as an alternative energy strategy, but the simple fact is that the most productive areas for development frequently overlap areas of great importance to native wildlife. Michael Fry‘s opinion piece in yesterday’s Los Angeles Times points out the problem well.

It’s time we started…

View original post 51 more words

Posted in life | Leave a comment

The Wild Side newsletter – March 2018


The Wildlife Diversity Program of our Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation publishes a great little e-newsletter: The Wild Side.

Screen Shot 2018-03-22 at 8.16.40 AM.png

This month’s issue hearkens to the extraordinary ecosystem diversity our state packs into its relatively modest area: mixed-grass prairie, Ozark caves, old-growth pine savanna – it’s all here.  Check it out!

Screen Shot 2018-03-22 at 8.23.17 AM.png

Posted in bat conservation, bird banding, birding, birds/nature, Endangered Species Act, environment, evolution, life, migrants, population estimates, population monitoring, wildlife | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

HBW Alive – newsletter #45


I’m always excited when I see the notice in my inbox of a new newsletter from Handbook of the Birds of the World. Here’s the first thing that caught my eye in this one:

Screen Shot 2018-03-21 at 9.26.41 AM.png

Okay. First, I am going to need to see a “Western Quail-thrush” before I shuffle off life’s mortal coil. It looks beautiful, and I always get a kick out of compound bird names suggesting that the bird can’t decide what it is.  Is it a quail? Is it a thrush? Stop – you’re both right!

On that same theme, shrike-tit?! Wait, this is a tit that behaviorally converges on shrikes?! That is immensely cool and I can’t wait to go look it up!

Finally, the bottom two whistlers have names that are quintessentially maddening to beginning birders. Rusty-breasted? Really? That faintly darker yellow-almost orange area is “rusty”, and that’s the most conspicuous part of that bird? How about its Black-chinned buddy? Oh I suppose that in the hand one could see some black feathering at the base of the lower mandible, but its white throat seems a bit more obvious. Maybe it’s just me . . . Regardless of their names though, you owe it to yourself to listen to this recording of Black-chinned Whistler song.

Of course, there is plenty to learn from every HBW Alive newsletter, so here’s one more teaser to get you to subscribe.

Screen Shot 2018-03-21 at 10.50.23 AM.png

 

 

Posted in animal behavior, bird evolution, birding, birds/nature, environment, HBW Alive, hummingbirds, IUCN, life, population estimates, population monitoring, wildlife | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Remote sensing for wildlife detection


Post provided by Tracey Hollings In an age of rapid technological advances, ecologists need to keep abreast of how we can improve or reinvent the way we do things. Remote sensing technology and image analysis have been developing rapidly and have the potential to revolutionise how we count and estimate animal populations. Using remotely sensed […]

via Remote Sensing for Counting Animals: Polar Bears, Sheep and Everything In-Between — methods.blog

Posted in academics, animal behavior, Endangered Species Act, environment, IUCN, life, weather, wildlife | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Under pressure – keep writing and talking to reduce gun violence


So much has happened since the #NeverAgain movement took hold in the wake of the Majory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Parkland, FL on February 14th. We’ve learned of multiple system failures, heard stories of heroism and of cowardice, seen people intentionally destroying their AR-15s, etc. Above all, we’ve been inspired (and many terrified) by a plucky band of soon-to-be voters who have taken the example of their school’s namesake and turned their grief into action. I’m less concerned about when those kids will be voting as I am when I will get to vote for them.

The 24-hour news cycle is exhausting, however. Yes, there has been plenty of pushback against the teenagers who just survived a shooting that killed 17 people in their school from heinous trolls for the NRA who evidently fear permanent erectile dysfunction if they can’t have all the guns all the time, some of which has included death threats. (Death. Threats. Toward the kids who just survived a school shooting.) Bloated, hypocritical, gas-bag pundits have also been busy pooh-pooh-ing the poor, emotional snowflakes who simply aren’t mature enough to have opinions on gun violence. The smart money though is on the ones laying low for now. They’ll will bide their time until some other shiny object grabs the public’s attention and before you know it exactly nothing will change, post-Parkland.

We can’t let that happen.

Here then is another letter template like the one I prepared last week but with an emphasis on specifics. If we let up on the pressure, I promise you that our elected officials will squirm away from this one and we’ll wonder why we didn’t do more when the next bloodbath erupts.

 

Again, you can try here to find the Senators and Representatives who are your voice in Congress. Full court pressure – don’t let them rest!

 

Frank Lucas
US House of Representatives
Oklahoma’s 3rd District
2405 Rayburn HOB
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Representative Lucas:

I am writing today to urge you to initiate legislative action to reduce gun violence in this country.

It is important that you display leadership on this issue. Further it is important for you to understand that, in addition to improving enforcement of existing regulations on firearms, there are multiple initiatives that can be pursued that are both enormously popular with American voters and rated as likely effective in reducing gun violence by experts in gun safety, risk assessment, and public policy. Here are three, specific proposals to do that. (Polling data from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/10/upshot/How-to-Prevent-Gun-Deaths-The-Views-of-Experts-and-the-Public.html.)

  1. Prevent sales of firearms to any person convicted of stalking another person. (85% support)
  2. Prevent sales of firearms to any person convicted of violent misdemeanor, including domestic assault. (83% support)
  3. Require background checks on all gun purchases from any seller. (86% support)

With an American electorate of approximately 224 million people, those three initiatives would be supported by at least 185 million eligible voters.

I am calling on you to pick any one of those 3 – or better all 3 of them – and introduce a bill in the House to help actually reduce gun violence in this country. I realize that your constituency includes many vocal supporters of 2nd Amendment rights, but this is where you must show the courage to do the right thing. None of the initiatives listed bans a particular weapon or magazine. Each one addresses keeping guns out of the hands of people who should not have them. The least you can do is nothing; this is a something. Do something.

 

 

Posted in life | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

You belong to the most powerful gun lobby in the US. Use your power.


The horror of yet another mass shooting in an American school is upon us, and no words of mine can express the tragedy of those moments more vividly than the sound of the screams captured by the young people who were its victims. I also lack the words to adequately capture the disappointment, shame, and revulsion I feel for our elected officials who have refused to take seriously the problem of gun violence in this country. Thus, this is not a post intended to convince readers that action is necessary. If you’re not convinced yet, then you never will be. This is a post to help those who get it actually do something.

Did you write to your senators and representatives, your governor, your mayor, your state legislators, etc., after Columbine? How about San Bernadino? Pulse? Newtown? No, me neither. Why not? Well for me it was just so patently obvious that we need a course correction on guns in this country that I didn’t think it necessary. First, if my elected representatives need to be told by me that a bunch of first-graders slaughtered amongst their crayons and juice boxes is indicative of a serious problem, then those people are not fit to serve in the offices to which they’ve been elected. Next, I assured myself that those officials would be buried in mountains of letters from other people expressing my same thoughts so my statement wasn’t really necessary.

How wrong I was.

First, yes. It is absolutely the case that the ranks of our elected halls are filled with people unfit to hold the offices in which they serve. Think back to how many days it has been since a state or federal elected official has been embroiled in controversy concerning something stupid and/or morally repugnant they had done. We cannot rely on these people to do the right thing or even know what the right thing is. These horses must be both led to water and made to drink.

Second, yes. Our elected officials are buried under letters, emails, and phone calls following each mass shooting in this country. The National Rifle Association and its army of Second Amendment zombie-“patriots” make sure of that. There is one thing our elected representatives understand on the issue of gun violence in America: Allow the barest whiff of any action more concrete than thoughts and prayers to be detected following a mass shooting and you will have raised the ire of the most powerful lobbying force in the country. The NRA will ensure that you will not be elected again should you start talking about “gun control”. (See the previous paragraph for an explanation of how the taint of a displeased electorate is sufficient to keep those in elected office from doing the right thing.)

But no matter how much money they have, we have more votes. The NRA claims 5 million members. The number of eligible voters in 2016 was estimated to be more than 224 million.

Screen Shot 2018-02-17 at 12.29.49 PM

Estimated number (in millions) of registered National Rifle Association members and U.S. eligible voters in 2016.

So why have the American people ceded power to a small number of bullies? The only difference between them and us is that they participate and we don’t. The NRA collects money to pay people to lobby Congress. There are people – lots of them – whose job it is to pressure our legislators to never budge an inch when it comes to “gun control” (whatever that means), and their membership self-selects for the kind of people who make a habit out of sharing their opinions with their elected officials. The rest of us aren’t wired that way. We’re not professional lobbyists. We also assume other people are as rational and humane as we are, but they’re not. That’s why the influence of just 5 million people is enough to hold our entire country hostage to their firearm fetishism.

But check this out. Quoctrung Bui and Margot Sanger-Katz from The New York Times have invested some work in both surveying public attitudes toward various measures to reduce gun violence and in surveying gun violence experts for their ranking of each initiative’s likelihood of success in reducing gun violence. (Here’s a link to the original survey from the polling firm Morning Consult.) On the figure below, everything plotted in the upper right quadrant is both popular with >50% of Americans and judged by experts to probably be effective.

 

Screen Shot 2018-02-17 at 6.14.20 PM.png

Here’s the important part, zoomed in:

Screen Shot 2018-02-17 at 6.16.13 PM.png

Here are 15 initiatives judged by experts to be >50% effective:

 

Screen Shot 2018-02-17 at 6.19.01 PM.png

 

Note how overwhelmingly popular many of them are. Take the top-rated example of requiring background checks on all gun purchases. We know that background checks are effective, but there are significant loopholes in the law that need to be closed. The experts say that universal background checks would help to reduce gun violence and, in this survey, 86% of those polled would be in favor of such a measure. That’s a ballpark estimate of 193 million American voters, and 193 million >> 5 million. Yes, WE could be the most powerful lobby in America.

The good news is that modest pressure from the rest of us can counteract intense pressure from the relatively few of them. If we want to change the culture we need to step up and apply that pressure. What if for every “from my cold, dead hands” letter a legislator received, there were ten “we demand mandatory reporting of lost or stolen guns” letters? That’s not happening now, and that’s the excuse that legislators give for their inaction on gun control. They hear – loudly and clearly – from the gun nuts, and they get comparatively little from the rest of us.

So here, today, right now. Do something. Write that letter. Write those letters (plural). Tell your friends you sent them. Share this link. One thing I can do is make it really easy for you to do that, and that is my ultimate aim of this post. Here goes.

There are plenty of resources to help you find the right people to contact. I used this one, typed in my Zip code, and voila! I was instantly provided with links to contact information for these fine gentlemen who represent the great state of Oklahoma.

Screen Shot 2018-02-18 at 8.17.33 AM.png

I’ll start with Lucas. Here is a template for a letter to Representative Lucas:

my name
my address
today’s date

Frank Lucas
US House of Representatives
Oklahoma’s 3rd District
2405 Rayburn HOB
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Representative Lucas:

I am writing today to urge you to initiate legislative action to reduce gun violence in this country. I assume that you do not need to be convinced that we have a problem, but that you might need to be convinced that there could be some viable solutions.

A recent survey and analysis by the polling firm Morning Consult was summarized by Bui and Sanger-Katz (2017) in the New York Times. Of 29 potential policy ideas to reduce gun violence, 15 were rated by experts to be more than 50% effective. (Efficacy was rated 0–10; fifteen of the ideas were ranked > 5.0.) Of those 15 potential policies, 8 were supported by at least 80% of the voting public surveyed. With an American electorate of approximately 224 million people, there are 8 policy initiatives judged by experts to be effective at reducing gun violence, and these are favored by 179 million eligible voters. The top-rated initiative (universal background checks) is favored by 193 million voters. (Link to article: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/10/upshot/How-to-Prevent-Gun-Deaths-The-Views-of-Experts-and-the-Public.html.)

I am calling on you to pick any one of those 8 – or better all 8 of them – and introduce a bill in the House to help actually reduce gun violence in this country. The American people are fed up with the inaction from Congress on gun violence. I realize that your constituency includes many vocal supporters of 2nd Amendment rights, but the numbers are not on their side. The National Rifle Association claims just 5 million members, for example. Without proactive efforts from hunters, gun enthusiasts, etc. they will become increasingly marginalized in a society that has progressed beyond them, and the 2nd Amendment itself could be in jeopardy. We are long past tired of watching our children leave their schools in body bags. Your choice is to become part of a solution or remain complicit in the problem. Please do something.

Sincerely,

my name

I will next print out my letter – it will fit on one side of an 8X11″ sheet of paper with 11-point font and 1″ margins – and mail it through the US Post to Representative Lucas. I will ALSO include the text of my letter in an email. Then I will send a nearly identical letter and email to Senators Lankford and Inhofe.

Now you do the same. Use my text. Cut and paste to communicate with your elected officials. My whole point is to help make this process so easy that you might be inclined to do it.  So do it. Today, resolve to join the most powerful lobby in our country. Please share this link when you share your letters, and let’s take this country back for the sake of safety and sanity regarding gun violence.

 

 

Posted in life | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments